Governance Operating Model

Council + owners + stewards + custodians — who decides, who owns, who curates, who runs?

0/2 done

Overview

Governance Operating Model

Council + owners + stewards + custodians — who decides, who owns, who curates, who runs?

Why it matters

A working governance model is four roles, ratified by a cross-functional council, with a lightweight exception process. Anything heavier dies in adoption.

Going deeper

The four roles map cleanly to RACI for any governance decision:

DecisionCouncilOwnerStewardCustodian
Policy ratificationACCI
Domain scope / definitionsIARI
Daily DQ + issue triageICAC
Storage / access enforcementICCA

If two cells in the same row both hold A, you've duplicated accountability and created a future blame fight. If a row has no A, that decision will fall through the floor.

Analogy

Think of a governance model as the operating crew of a museum.

  • The board of trustees sets policy on what the museum collects and how it treats visitors. That's your data council.
  • Each gallery has a curator — the named expert responsible for what hangs on the walls and whether the labels are right. That's your data owner per domain.
  • Conservators quietly fix the cracks, clean the paint, swap out the lighting. Day-to-day quality. That's your data steward.
  • Building services run the HVAC, the security alarms, the loading dock. They don't decide what's on the walls; they keep the building open. That's your data custodian (the platform / DBA team).

Confuse curator with conservator and the gallery looks great but the paint flakes. Confuse either with building services and the doors lock at 6 p.m. with no warning.

Make it stick

Use the prompts below to anchor governance operating model to something you actually own.

  • Pick a recent data incident in your org. Which of the four roles was *missing* or *unclaimed* at the time?
  • For your most-relied-on dataset, can you name the owner, steward, and custodian *today*? If not, you have a governance gap, not a tooling gap.
  • What's the smallest version of this model you could pilot — one domain, four named humans — next quarter?

Reading in progress · 0 of 2 activities done